首页> 外文OA文献 >Application of best practice guidelines for OSCEs: an Australian evaluation of their feasibility and value
【2h】

Application of best practice guidelines for OSCEs: an Australian evaluation of their feasibility and value

机译:欧安组织最佳做法准则的应用:澳大利亚对其可行性和价值的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) are widely used in health professional education and should be based on sound pedagogical foundations.\ud\udObjectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and utility of using Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs) within an OSCE format in a broad range of tertiary education settings with under-graduate and post-graduate nursing and midwifery students. We evaluated how feasible it was to apply the BPGs to modify OSCEs in a course; students' perspective of the OSCE; and finally, if the BPG-revised OSCEs better prepared students for clinical practice when compared with the original OSCEs.\ud\udDesign: A mixed method with surveys, focus groups and semi-structured interviews evaluated the BPGs within an OSCE.\ud\udSettings: Four maximally different contexts across four sites in Australia were used.\ud\udParticipants: Participants included lecturers and undergraduate nursing students in high and low fidelity simulation settings; under-graduate midwifery students; and post-graduate rural and remote area nursing students.\ud\udResults: 691 students participated in revised OSCEs. Surveys were completed by 557 students; 91 students gave further feedback through focus groups and 14 lecturers participated in interviews. At all sites the BPGs were successfully used to modify and implement OSCEs. Students valued the realistic nature of the modified OSCEs which contributed to students' confidence and preparation for clinical practice. The lecturers considered the revised OSCEs enhanced student preparedness for their clinical placements.\ud\udDiscussion and Conclusions: The BPGs have a broad applicability to OSCEs in a wide range of educational contexts with improved student outcomes. Students and lecturers identified the revised OSCEs enhanced student preparation for clinical practice. Subsequent examination of the BPGs saw further refinement to a set of eight BPGs that provide a sequential guide to their application in a way that is consistent with best practice curriculum design principles.
机译:背景:客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)在健康专业教育中得到广泛使用,应基于良好的教学基础。\ ud \ ud目标:本研究的目的是评估使用最佳实践指南(BPG)的可行性和实用性以OSCE格式提供,适用于大专教育环境,面向本科和研究生护理和助产士学生。我们评估了在课程中应用BPG修改OSCE的可行性。学生对欧安组织的看法;最后,如果经过BPG修订的OSCE与原始OSCE相比能更好地为学生准备临床实践。\ ud \ udDesign:采用调查,焦点小组和半结构化访谈的混合方法评估了OSCE中的BPG。\ ud \ udSettings:在澳大利亚的四个站点中使用了四个最大不同的上下文。\ ud \ ud参与者:参与者包括在高保真度和低保真度模拟环境中的讲师和护理学大学生;本科助产士学生;结果:691名学生参加了修订的OSCE。 557名学生完成了调查。 91个学生通过焦点小组提供了进一步的反馈,有14位讲师参加了访谈。在所有站点上,BPG均已成功用于修改和实施OSCE。学生重视修改后的OSCE的现实性,这有助于学生增强信心并为临床实践做准备。讲师认为,经修订的OSCE可以增强学生的临床准备水平。\ ud \ ud讨论与结论:BPG在广泛的教育环境中具有广泛的适用性,可以提高学生的学习成果,因此适用于OSCE。学生和讲师确定了经修订的OSCE增强了学生为临床实践做准备。随后对BPG进行了检查,进一步完善了八个BPG的集合,以与最佳实践课程设计原则一致的方式为它们的应用提供了顺序指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号